With a playoff berth all but locked up for the New York Rangers, we look
forward toward potential playoff match-ups. Of course, we have mostly
forgotten our bold proclamations that expectations would be met and
thirsts quenched with nothing more than a playoff appearance. But as is
human nature, greed follows accumulation of wealth and we all want more;
some are even bold enough to run the phrase "We want the Cup!" through
their minds for the briefest of moments.
The last thing I want to do is to chastise these dreamers. Hope is the
lifeblood of professional sports, the only way to attract millions of
fans to a team whose mathematical odds of success are 3% in any given
season. It would be especially ambitious to bury a team that has gone
8-1-1 in the last 10 games, and would play 3 of 4 rounds in a conference
with no distinct top dog. No, instead I come to analyze these hopes and
demonstrate where this team stands currently, what they do well, and
what they need to do better to justify the dreaming.
Strengths
It begins, as it should and as it often does in the playoffs, with
goaltending. More than enough has been said about the abilities and
successes of Henrik Lundqvist. But
merely citing a 2.24 GAA (5th among goalies with 50+ starts), .924 Sv%
(4th) and a league high 11 shutouts does not suffice. The most important
attribute of the Swedish 29 year old is his clutch play. Throughout the
course of the season he does surrender "soft goals" and they
occasionally come at key moments in the game. But as the weather warms,
so does The King, and he transforms from a very good goalie into a great
one. We have seen goalies steal more than one series, there is no
reason why Lundqvist can't do the same.
Depth is another key playoff word. We have seen it in Detroit,
Pittsburgh and Chicago and in a league of parity it has become a recipe
for success. Though Marc Staal (25:39 TOI/G) may do his best to convince
you otherwise, a team's top defensive player cannot stay on the ice for
all 60 minutes. If a team can get its scorers on the ice against
inferior defensive units, the chance of victory skyrockets. The Rangers
have one of the deepest teams with 9 forwards who tallied double-digits
in goals. They also have five players who have potted 20, and one in
Anisimov (18) who may just get there before the year ends. The "4th
line" has combined for 43 goals on the season, approximately 42 more
than could be counted on from the likes of a Hollweg-Betts-Orr combo
that we have seen in years past. Depth will certainly be a huge
advantage for this team in the closely defended playoff-style games.
Of course, we would be remiss not to mention the outstanding defense,
both as a position and as a system. The Rangers don't allow too many
pucks through to Henrik Lundqvist, placing 10th in shots allowed per
game with 29.3 shots.But
again, that stat does not tell the whole story. The Blueshirts are
extremely prolific shot blockers (4th, 1213), led by Dan Girardi and his
league leading (by far) 213 blocks. As a team, they collapse around the
front of the net and force shots from the outside. The few that do get
through are much easier for Lundqvist to handle than, say a one-timer
from the slot. They also are a punishing defense, leading the league
with a whopping 2164 hits, so even if you beat them, they still beat
you. Overall, the system is perfect for playoff hockey and almost mimics
the efficiency of the Renney system without sacrificing as much
offense.
Honorable Mentions: Penalty Kill (11th, 83.4%; 4th, 11 SHG), Youth (10th, 26.973 average age)
Weaknesses
Toews and Kane. Crosby and Malkin. Datsyuk and Zetterberg. Elite scorers
all, who just happened to have won it all once in the past three years.
But it is certainly not happenstance that the recent Cup winners have
had at least two elite scorers climbing over the boards every two and a
half minutes.
This is a purely causal relationship: the objective of the game is to
outscore opponents, so the more people who can help in that task, the
better. So while we talked about depth as the offensive strength of the
Rangers, the weakness is clearly top-end scoring talent. To this point
not one Ranger has scored 25 goals this year. The team's best forward,
Marian Gaborik, has been inconsistent at best and a liability at worst.
And while 4 other players have potted 20+ goals, none of them are
players who can take over a game, not yet at least. In 2009 we watched
Ovechkin take over the 1st round series against the Rangers, shooting
post-shattering bullets from all angles. He almost singlehandedly
brought his team back from a 3-1 series deficit. With no individual to
rely on, the Rangers' entire team will need to play a near-perfect game
to win it. This is no easy task in a grueling playoff series and it may
just be New York's downfall.
Puck possession is a key word in the Tortorella system, and his club has
been mightily effective at winning pucks in no-man's-land.
But pucks in the hand of the official has been a whole different story.
Face-offs are a game-changer. A lost defensive zone draw can turn into a
goal faster than you can say "Colony Grill Pizza" (extra points if you
got the reference). Draws also have a tremendous effect on special
teams, where puck possession is the difference between multiple scoring
chances and chasing the puck 200 feet down the ice. Rangers centers have
been so ineffective (28th, 47.1%) that wingers have begun taking draws,
and even poor line match-ups have been thrown out on the ice to get a
specialist in the circle. The only way to even justify the existence of
Chris Drury has been to cite his face-off prowess. So aside from the
problems caused by a lost draw, the steps taken to correct it have had
ill effects on other parts of the game.
I know, I know - I gave an honorable mention to youth as a strength of
this team, and it some respects it is good to be fresh, full of energy,
full of belief. But the players that the team relies heavily on are all
young and inexperienced. Teams benefit from having a veteran player who
has ability to lead a team on the stat-sheet as well as in the locker
room. When an experienced hockey player has a big game, it can have a
calming effect on the younger players. They don't feel like they have to
win it all by themselves. This problem will be exacerbated by the lack
of elite scorer, and we may find Dubinsky or Stepan pressing a bit too
hard (as we have seen them do in the past), only to become ineffective
at the worst possible time.
Honorable Mention:
Power Play (13th, 17.8%; better of late).
Every team in the Eastern Conference has some issues,
some more serious than others. Can the Rangers go far in spite of their
weaknesses? Possibly, but probably not. The way to take advantage of the
wide open draw is to minimize the weaknesses, no easy task at this
point of the season, and maximize the strengths. Someone needs to step
up and go on a scoring rampage. Someone needs to seize the moment and
lead the team to victory. As John Tortorella likes to say, "Stay the
course." Play within the system, a system built around the personnel,
but also step it up to another level.
This New York, after all. Where all you need is a dollar and a dream.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave Comments Below